Ivy League Conservatives

If you're new here and like what you read, subscribe to my RSS feed. Thank you for visiting!

There is a disturbing trend I’ve discussed offline quite frequently, but haven’t blogged about. One that should infuriate any woman, husband/boyfriend, brother or father of a daughter, but somehow hasn’t angered thinking civilians into action. 

Muslim males all over the world are raping young women in non-Muslim dress. What’s more, they seem to rationalize their assault by saying that the woman’s dress conveyed the impression that she was ‘asking for it’. 

My own experience with acceptable dress is on the other end of the spectrum. Growing up in Los Angeles, California, I was exposed to women who wore far less on a warm summer’s day than any Muslim male could dare dream of. These women had the freedom to wear what they pleased, and did so. In other cultures, this apparently isn’t so. Whether a woman should wear a revealing outfit should never be tied to whether she can wear one without fear of rape. 

Let’s back up a bit, however, because this issue doesn’t begin with adult women. It belongs with young girls, as I read this afternoon from The Star:

KUALA LUMPUR: A Malaysian group condemned the uniform worn by girls at government schools, saying it encouraged rape and pre-marital sex.

“The white blouse is too transparent for girls and it becomes a source of attraction,” National Islamic Students Association of Malaysia vice-president Munirah Bahari said in a statement.

“It becomes a distraction to men, who are drawn to it, whether or not they like looking at it,” she said, calling for a review of uniform policy so that it did not violate Islamic ideals.

The obscene uniforms in question? Not these:

But these:

Hussies and temptresses, indeed. How is a child wearing a mandatory school-issued uniform encouraging rape?

Abul Kasem, an ex-Muslim author, sheds some light on Islam as it relates to this trend as he quotes from, then translates a passage from the Koran [FrontPage Magazine]:

Muslim women must always keep their ‘meat’ covered whenever they venture out.

Infidel women who do not hide their ‘meat’ inside Jilbab and Hijab are either maidservants or whores.

 

The white Australian women who do not dress Islamically are maidservants or whores.

 

In Islam, Muslim men are allowed to have unlimited sexual intercourse with maidservants and/or sexual slaves. A Muslim man commits rape if and only if he has sex with a Muslim woman out of wedlock. Having forced sex with an infidel, uncovered woman does not at all constitute rape, Islamically speaking.

 

The natural conclusion is that Muslim men are completely free to Islamically rape these infidel women, if these whores fall in Muslim men’s hands.

This is the culture from which these men are raised. It’s a culture that has not evolved, despite its followers evolving to take advantage of the luxuries of modern life. The FrontPage panel continues:

Regarding dress, there is constant agitation about the wearing of veils in school, the Chador and the Niqab at work and in the street, while separate gym spaces and locker rooms are demanded for Muslim school-girls. Regarding institutions, there is much pressure, particularly in the UK , to bring Islamic families under the umbrella of Sharia law.

Note that all of these controversies have to do with the proper garb of Islamic women, the concealment of their naked flesh from infidel eyes, and the regulation of their marital condition. Bluntly put, these teapot tempests all have to do with controlling Muslim women’s sexuality in the liberal climate of the Infidel Diaspora.

Dr. Kobrin would have insights about this, but whatever its basis, the fear of female sexuality is intense, and is deeply rooted among Arab men. It has its counterpart in female shame - a shame so great that village girls will submit to painful and dangerous cliteroidectomies intended to blunt their sexual pleasure and desire.

As the Israeli anthropologist Raphael Patai put it in his classic study, “The Arab Mind,” “women are seen to be like animals, highly sexed, and willing to have intercourse with any man.” This Islamic phobia against female sexuality is not a fall-out of modernity, but has a long history: a typical story in the unexpurgated Arabian Nights tells of a noble, handsome prince, married to a beautiful and loving princess, who is called away from his palace on a mission. But as soon as he is out the door, his princess rushes to copulate with a dirty, diseased, but well-endowed black slave. The message is clear: women have an uncontrollable, unappeasable sexual appetite that will seize on any object, however inappropriate.

Islamic immigrants to the West want to take advantage of its higher living standards, and political freedoms; but they do not want their women to be liberated along with them. In their thinking, female political and social liberation ultimately leads to the dreaded outcome of sexual liberation, and to the emergence of the sexually omnivorous woman.

We could quibble all day about the intricacies of the Koran that permit men to rape women. What I’m concerned about is that society at large hasn’t figured out how to stop these rapes from happening. More policemen around areas with restaurants and bars in the evenings? Are male policemen sympathetic to the poor Muslim man’s plight in this modern world of miniskirts and tube tops? Is no one in Europe influential or brave enough to step up to the plate and protect its women?

image from limitstogrowth.org.